Return to APA Collection Inventory Page

Copyright Restrictions

Image file of document

Text of document:

and, therefore, should be avoided by clinical neuropsychologists. In regard to the "rehabilitation" exemplar, there was concern that this could be confused with the specialty recognized by the American Board of Professional Psychology, known as "rehabilitation psychology." Others did not find this constraining since rehabilitation psychology, was not recognized by CRSPPP. Indeed, it was thought by some that a precedent had been set in the neurology community, which recognized an interest area of neuro-rehabilitation despite the existence of the medical specialty of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Following this circumspection, discretion was not thought to be necessary at this time, since only exemplars of possible sub-specialties, rather than the existence of the sub-specialties themselves, were under consideration. In the light of the above, it was decided to address the issue of sub-specialties rather than proficiencies in clinical neuropsychology. The outcome of these deliberations was the wording in section XI of the policy statement.

The role of continuing education in clinical neuropsychology was introduced to the delegates with the question: "What can continuing education legitimately provide and what should it not provide?" Reference was made to materials from the Commission for the Recognition of Specialties and Proficiencies in Professional Psychology (CRSPPP), which identified an intensive series of continuing education workshops as a way to acquire a proficiency (American Psychological Association, 1995). It was pointed out that certain standards (6.01 through 6.05) from the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (American Psychological Association, 1992) pertaining to education and teaching issues needed to be kept in mind. The statement by the American Psychological Association concerning the role and limitations of continuing education (Committee for the Approval of Continuing Education Sponsors, 1996) was identified for reference along with the Report of the Division 40 Task Force (Bornstein, 1998).

Congruence was quickly reached with the APA position that continuing education was not a substitute for the basic academic education needed for entry to the field of psychology nor should it be the primary vehicle for career changes into a specialty area in psychology. Conceptually, continuing education should be designed to meet the needs of post-graduate professionals within psychology. It was agreed that continuing education is necessary for maintaining and updating previously acquired knowledge and skills by specialists in clinical neuropsychology, regardless of whether one s state licensing board required continuing education credits. It was also agreed this was not a method for acquiring core competencies. There was no disagreement with any of these positions among the delegates. The result of these deliberations became section XII of the policy statement.
 

The preamble to the policy statement was discussed. A question was raised as to why a description of the conference application and selection process was included. It was explained that some individuals were likely to have only a copy of the policy statement. The idea was to include some information about the conference for them and to refer them to the full proceedings. Delegates discussed the placement of this material and whether it should be in a separate section. They decided to leave it where it was in the preamble. The chair of the planning committee was asked if application letters actually had been sent to all members of Division 40 and NAN. She said that APA did a mailing to all members of Division 40. The planning committee bought the mailing list for all full members of NAN and the University of Houston did a mailing to everyone on the list. Wording with respect to diversity was discussed. It was suggested that the sentence be changed from "neuropsychologists who were thought to reflect diversity" to simply "neuropsychologists who reflect diversity." This change was accepted. A suggestion to replace the word "sex" to "gender" was not accepted. A suggestion was made to mention the attendance of the observer from the Board of Educational Affairs (BEA) in this section. Since the observers had not deliberated on the issues, the idea of mentioning observer participation in the conference was rejected. The phrase "Heretofore, there has been no widely recognized and accepted description of integrated education and training" was discussed. It was pointed out that there are integrated models in Canada but they are not widely accepted, so it was recommended that "widely" be left in. It was recommended also that "heretofore" be removed and that it be replaced by "nevertheless" since heretofore suggests that there is a model that now is accepted. A model that had been proposed had not been accepted yet. The description of clinical neuropsychology in the first sentence of the preamble was discussed. It was pointed out that clinical neuropsychology is a specialty within the discipline of psychology. When one delegate said that clinical neuropsychology was the first specialty to be recognized by APA, the delegates were reminded by the representative of the BEA that school, counseling, and clinical psychology have traditionally thought of as specialties. It was suggested that the sentence could say: "Clinical neuropsychology was just recently recognized as a specialty." It was decided that the first sentence should read: "Clinical neuropsychology is a specialty formally recognized by the American Psychological Association (APA) and the Canadian Psychological Association (CPA).
 The importance of including statements regarding cultural diversity in the document was introduced. There was some discussion regarding the exact wording and placement of such statements. Those making the suggestion agreed to work out the wording and make the proposal for where such statements should be placed when the document was to be printed out for final approval.
 A second proposal was made that language be included that would indicate that the document to be produced would apply only to the future training of neuropsychologists, not to those who are already trained. Again, those making the proposal agreed to work out wording and placement when the final document was to be printed out for final approval. Delegates then would be able to see the precise wording and where it was to be placed before engaging in discussion. The final reconsideration of the documents was scheduled to begin at 6:00 pm and it was anticipated that final plenary consideration of the document could probably be completed by 8:00 pm. General consent was given by the assembly to the planning committee to clean up the language without changing the meaning for the final policy statement after the conference was concluded.
 Final discussion of the policy statement began with the positioning of the description of the conference in the document, It was decided that the

 49

(End of text)

Comments | LSU Libraries | Louisiana State University Hill Memorial Library Louisiana State Univeristy Baton Rouge, LA 70803 Public Services Desk: (225) 578-6544 Reference Desk: (225) 578-6568 Fax (225) 578-9425 Copyright © 1996 - 2007 LSU Libraries Last updated: Wednesday, 29-Aug-2007 16:12:19 CDT