Visual Materials Section Logo
1998 Annual Meeting, Orlando

Visual Materials Section

Cataloging and Access Roundtable



Back to the HOME page | Back to the MINUTES list


Introductions

Kate Bowers, chair, introduced herself and chair-elect James Eason.

A quick show-of-hands indicated most members work with original visual materials, a few with surrogate images, 6-10 work with moving image collections, and 3 are from museums, 1 from a commercial agency, about 6 are from governmental archives, and about 10 from colleges or universities.

Chair elect

A call for volunteers or nominations for VMCAR vice chair/chair-elect was made.

Reports

Program proposals

Program proposals for SAA 1999 in Pittsburgh were solicited.

Visual Materials Section

James Eason reported on this years Visual Materials Section meeting.

Submissions to the section newsletter VIEWS are always encouraged by editor Laurie Baty

A section website is planned.

A section committee is reviewing visual materials publications to recommend for update by SAA. An update of Ritzenthaler is definitely being planned (details on status will appear in VIEWS).

Description Section

Kate Bowers reported on the Description Section meeting.

The release of EAD Version 1 was announced, with an anticipated Spring publication dates for a text on guidelines for use.

The first meeting of the new EAD Roundtable was announced.

There was discussion of "content vs. carrier" in cataloging (example: digital version of a map: is it computer file? Or map?)

The addition of the 856 field to MARC authority records was announced. This will allow linking of biographical/historical texts to name authority records.

The Description Section has a web site: http://www.library.yale.edu/~dsmith/saa/saadescr.htm

The Finding Aid Fair in the exhibit hall was announced.

Archival Motion Picture Archivists

AMIA reports that work continues on a revision of Archival moving image materials : a cataloging manual.

More details on this and other AMIA news are available at AMIA's website: http://www.amianet.org

Moving Image Genre / Form guide is being compiled at LC. See website: http://lcweb.loc.gov/rr/mopic/migintro.html

Resources for Visual Image cataloging

ArtMARC sourcebook : cataloging art, architecture, and their visual images is a recent (1998) publication with useful reports from various institutions engaged in image cataloging. Chapters include reports from slide libraries, architectural collections, fine art collections, and historical societies, among others. Several detailed tables provide ready comparison of various institutions' use of MARC fields for different data types. Although there is a heavy emphasis on art slide collections, there is good variety represented, and the comparisons are interesting and informative.

Art and Architecture Thesaurus: Michelle Futornick of the Getty Information Institute announced the AAT Roundtable, at which the new Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names (TGN) would be discussed. Also, reorganization at Getty will change the nature and name of the GII, but they will continue all current activities and AAT support & development. See: http://www.gii.getty.edu/ and http://www.gii.getty.edu/vocabulary/index.html
[The links above are dead; see Research at the Getty and Vocabulary Databases for current information. mem, May 2002]

Library of Congress: Anne Mitchell reported that their Farm Security Administration photo site is up on the web, as is a baseball card collection. No news to report on LC Thesaurus for Graphic Materials (LCTGM). Both LCTGM I and II are available via the web. Alpha testing of EAD continues. Minor revisions to Elisabeth Betz Parker's Graphic materials : rules for describing original items and historical collections have been issued (some time ago) and are included in the Cataloger's Workstation cd-rom, but no new paper edition is being planned. Many roundtable members expressed strong interest in an updated edition of this text, and Ann Mitchell agreed to look into this further at LC. It was suggested that perhaps an update could be instigated by SAA or roundtable members, with a new editor (if Elisabeth Betz Parker of other LC staff members are not available, and are supportive.) The possibilities are not clear, but Anne Mitchell and James Eason will be in contact to investigate.

VMCAR website: after discovering that all but one roundtable member have access to the web and use it regularly, input was requested for useful resources for the VMCAR site. Kate Bowers will continue to maintain this site. There was interest in supplementing the membership list with "areas of expertise or interest." Logistics for creating this element on the existing membership list are as follows: the rountable collected e-mail addresses of those willing to be contacted by colleagues; those willing to share their expertise will have their area and their email address added to the membership list on the web stie.

Hot Topics: various discussion points

Suggested discussion topics: EAD for visual materials, and use of non-MARC image databases.

About 50% of those present are using EAD for their visual collections. Some comments (roughly paraphrased):

  1. "It allows quick keyword searching and the process of preparation forces review and improvement of text for mark-up"
  2. "it's a two-edged sword, and highlights the weakness of some finding aids"
  3. "needed review is time consuming - it can't be turned over to a student assistant"
  4. "Mixed feelings: EAD is manucripts-driven, and not ideal for visual collections. An item-level database might be better, because the linear text format of EAD feels limiting"
  5. "EAD may be a 'stop-gap' improvement for access, but falls short of ideal"
  6. "I'm not a cataloger, and much prefer finding aid descriptions"
Some smaller institutions are getting their existing finding aids marked up in EAD through larger projects at other institutions (like the Online Archive of California project.)

About 8 members reported that they catalog at the item level in formats other than MARC.

Use-driven item-level MARC cataloging is being done at the Smithsonian. When items are requested for publication or exhibit, they get cataloged. The facilitates tracking usage and copy negatives as well as future access.

An anonymous comment was reported: "Forget EAD. It's obsolete." Those present presumed that this comment was in reference to XML replacing SGML, which will not make EAD obsolete. EAD is XML compliant.

Publications were revisited. More discussion of Graphic Materials edition (Betz Parker). It was suggested that sample MARC records might be a useful resource to put on the VMCAR website. Ritzenthaler revision discussion also continued, with varying opinions expressed as to its usefulness: some felt that it is too dense, yet too general, but there is nothing else suitable for interns of beginners. It was not compared favorably to the AMIA manual, which was perceived as much stronger.


Back to the VMCAR HOME page | Back to the MINUTES list